“How can we be here free and secure?”

In preparation for the series of discussion circles with Jack Bratich
Three Thursdays, April 10th, 17th and 24th – 5:30pm to 7:30pm
at the Emily Harvey Foundation, NYC, for the "ABC No Rio 45 Years" exposition
#ABCNoRio45

THE ANNOUNCEMENT As institutional structures sway and melt, the autonomous “monster” institutions assume a more important role. How can ABC No Rio step into those new shoes which are growing larger every day?
How can the network of resistant solidarity centers around the country and around the world understand itself as the ganglia of a new world brain? How can our will to freedom and bright living spread across borders as deftly as big capital? As for ABC No Rio, ruins, rebuilding, resistance, resilience -- What does it mean to return with a review/remembrance to re-establish something in these times, after a decade in exile?
Jack Bratich is an ABC No Rio Zine Library volunteer and professor of Journalism & Media Studies at Rutgers University Texts, prompts and links will be posted here at
https://abcnoriosummerschool.blogspot.com/

To add to this string, please send to awm13579 [at] yahoo.com with subject line
"How Can We Be Here?


COMMUNICATIONS
2 FEB 25
Dear Jack,
This is the question I awoke with today,
“How can we be here free and secure?”
which immediately struck me as a 16 Beaver assembly kind of question.
Maybe we could invite Ayreen and Rene to convene one, at the end of your sessions?
Besides just having “another idea” for structuring a program,
I’d like to start a process of considering what is necessary to discuss at this exposition of the radical and aesthetic pasts of ABC No Rio.
As institutional structures sway and melt, the autonomous “monster” institutions assume a more important role. How can ABC No Rio step into those new shoes which are growing larger every day?
And how can the network of resistant solidarity centers around the country and around the world understand itself as the ganglia of a new world brain? How can our will to freedom and bright living spread across borders as deftly as big capital?

Jack replies,
Some keywords I’m gathering from your emails:
Ruins, rebuilding, resistance, resilience (but not neoliberalism’s version—more about security and solidarity that can weather storms). What does it mean to return with a review/remembrance?
I really like the question about how ABC No Rio returns from the ruins to re-establish something in these times, after a decade in exile (it shuttered during the last months of the Obama administration, e.g.). Being here free and secure has a different inflection in times when we need shelter from far right rains/reigns, which include a reactionary capture of culture. …
*You know that Ayreen and Rene are also part of the exodus from NYC, now primarily in Armenia? They could set up a virtual 16B convening around these questions, which in itself would address the question of networks (centers, digital, physical).
*The closing of some key spaces in the mid to late 2010s (16B, Not an Alternative, No Rio) and the relocation and struggles of others like Bluestockings have changed the landscape. The Base was a good attempt to keep things going in Bushwick but it too ended (pandemic times I think).
I say this from a distance, as I left the LES for Philadelphia in 2018, in part after seeing these places wane.
Others who are still in NY can fill in the gaps, but from what I’ve seen and heard, places like The PIT and Mil Mundos have become nodes in the Brooklyn political intellectual scene, as well as the stalwart Woodbine in Ridgewood.
*Addressing the networks of care, solidarity, resistance through physical and digital connectivity is at least 15 years old, but there’s likely some new experiments that we could invite and look for. The Pal-Sol encampments were one example, though university based. How is it the most vibrant public actions in NYC over the past year were at NYU and Columbia?
*Meanwhile, how did the Right take hold as countercultural force in Manhattan (I’m thinking here of Dimes Square). How is this related to the rise of hyper-gentrification below Delancey in the decade of No Rio’s ruins and rebuilding? Is Dimes Square the reactionary autonomous monster institution? Or a mutant simulation since it seems to swim in Peter Thiel money sometimes.
Older question: how does any city (but here NYC) still generate communities in affective connection when disaggregation, disconnection, and alienation are endemic.
Hope this spurs some things. I’m also thinking about ways to include a wider range of voices (communities, ages, identities) into the April series, so will send a separate message about that. …


From Marc Herbst in Leipzig, Germany
Dear Alan and Jack, 
I spent some realy meaningful time at ABC, having lived directly across the street in 1997/1998….
I’ve been telling Alan about social centers in Leipzig I’m involved in… zoro being the big one. You won’t be able to google for it, although they are really an amazing and vibrant space> They purposely have no web presence. On paper, their block of house, concert venue, free store, bike shop, metal and wood shops and press and cheap punk housing are meant as a youth project which covers a lot for a network of projects. 
I’ve strangely been doing a lot of institutional work lately- working on an independent non-profit figuring out how to fund left cultural ecosystems to very limited results, and also progressive cultural curating in Italy in an “autonomous" region living about 7 years ago in some weird euro-cultural haze. 
Also, been working at the margins of electoral left movements in Germany as friends have been structurally working with the Linke - and while everyone in germany is freaking out about tomorrow’s election, one bright spot is the surge the left expects to see (fingers crossed) based on smart organizing, position change (they opened to  demands for  human rights in gaza) and also have been organizing both door-to-door campaigns (strangely not common here) and also having open hours to look at people’s rental contracts. 
This in a city (Leipzig) where the fascists have been running riot in the rest of the state of saxony since 2012. 
But/and to be honest, my work and interests are on relational aspects of solidarity and landscapes for care and relationality at a variety of levels. 
I think my recent trend is to think around matrixes of institutions and scales of touch- from the intimate social to the institution to the party and beyond.
As ahistorical and disjuncted practices buffeted by legal and extra-legal challenges by the right…. NOT only on an ideological level but in the streets (which means rent at this point) and in the law.
I’ve no idea about NYC or LA or Berlin for that matter- I have no fucking idea how anyone under 30 manages to pay the sky-high rent, eat and have a joyful life without reproducing a version of militant heteropatriarchy or rent-scam hyperindividualistic flophouse which is decidedly not a utopia though it might pose as one.
Margins and marginal practice, care and calmness, anger and collective action. 
With something like a sense of levity ‘cause were only human. 
with interest, 
Marc

Machine Minds and Neo-Ludditism, part 2

Your blogger returns to Medialab in Madrid to soak up some practical creative thinking around the advent of Artificial Intelligence. The “Synthetic Minds” event was a fun afternoon with lots to chew on. Foremost for me was an artwork from the new analytic movement of “critical AI studies”, a formidable early result in that scholarly front. And a proponent of neo-Ludditism, an engineer against the steam hammer. (Guarantee: No AI used in the writing of this post!)
Trevor Paglen gave the keynote talk I blogged in the last post here. It anchored a program of short-term residencies at Madrid’s Medialab Matadero called “Synthetic Minds”. These developent projects teamed artists to use AI in new works. I attended some of the presentations of fledgling works in progress, along with talks by the groups’ mentors.
The first evening was disappointing, but I shall not dish. The mentor of this group was into a kind of technomysticism, and the projects concerned mermaids and an AI “basilisk”. I’d call this the Netflix development team. Artists gotta eat.
The second evening was more to my taste. It was kicked off by curator Bani Brusadin, who I’d met at the dinner after Trevor Paglen’s talk. In his talk, Brusadin referenced a posted January ‘24 discussion on the state of AI development at the WEF at Davos. Ugh: “We have way too many things for us to think about and work on when we think about what can make the most money,” says Kai-Fu Lee. This ur-capitalist encounter group talks about the “vast automaton” with its “hidden decisions” that is being built. (“Computer says ‘no’.”)
Brusadin compared this build-up to the earlier revolution in logistics – container ships, Amazon distribution centers. He reached back to Victorian-era thinkers, and cited Charles Babbage on the autonomy of machines. My notes were fast and now barely llegible, but I’ll note that searching on one term he mentioned, the fiction genre of AI horror, is a thing. “Hal” is the Mae West of the genre.
To confront this emergent basilisk, let’s say, whose glance turns (has turned) us all into data, Brusadin declared that we need a new conception of a public sphere. This can be built from “what refuses to be computed”, the overall relationship between the synthetic and the factual. This is a struggle to define what is real and what is possible.

Anatomy of an AI system (Joler and Crawford, 2018)
He cited Laura Tripaldi's '22 book Parallel Minds: Discovering the Intelligence of Materials on "state-of-the-art chemistry, synthetic biology, and nanotech". This feminist engineer gives examples of data app results which escape their models. Brusadin also pointed to the extensive series of podcasts generated by the Medialab program on their website.

Xenosocialist World-Building

A lot of the discourse in these presentations was about intelligences – animal, vegetable, mineral – that escape human and human-modelled AI comprehension.
The first project presented was a science fiction future, positing “feral AIs” and “AI spirits” resulting from the “implosion of a massive dataset” in 2054. (Animal minds and spirituality are un-computable.) The voice of “xenosocialism” is a pirate radio station out to free us all. Sounds cool, very Cory Doctorow. The object of it is to “take the burden of emancipation off of our human shoulders”. If only.
Another project team had built compact run-around devices with a rather fuzzy object of discovering “Latent Intimacies”. They strapped one onto a cat who slinked around the Matadero complex.
There was (is?) a bunch of other stuff (see links below), but the mind-blower for me was mentor Vladan Joler’s presentation of the new map “Calculating Empires”, a “critical cartography of technology and power” (2020).
Joler showed tiny detailed images then zoomed in to comprehensive, indeed massive charts of the development of AI on multiple levels. Joler built this with collaborator Kate Crawford.

The Map Is the Territory

There’s nothing like big maps and colorful charts to give the idea that massively complex systems as they are pictured can be comprehensible. I’ve been entranced by this illusory kind of understanding since the periodic table in my high school chem class. The work of Mark Lombardi and Bureau d'études, and the fabulous chartings of the Iconoclasistas are always a thrill to encounter. That’s art; that’s modern iconography.

"Nuestra Señora de la Rebeldía", by Iconoclasistas (2011)

“Calculating Empires” is a masterwork of the genre. One tweet praised it as life-changing: @NataliaStanusch tweeted: "Overwhelming in the best of ways." The show inspired her to start a PhD on AI and media studies.
AI studies departments are springing up quickly in academic institutions. I’ll guess that many of those which are not engineering courses come out of game design curricula. The ones that come from media studies sectors are taking a more hard tack big picture approach to an emergent technology that is, as Dan McQuillan wrote, "the steam hammer of limited imagination, a solution to problems defined in administrative offices and enforced through predictive boundaries".

Calculating Empires infographic, a small detail

Critical AI Studies

Dan McQuillan, a lecturer at Goldsmiths in London and author of Resisting AI: An Anti-fascist Approach to Artificial Intelligence, is one among a new crop of critical AI researchers.
I found him by searching “Is there an actual AI agent of political resistance?”. That is the question the Xenosocialists answer in fiction.
In podcasts, McQuillan talks about how "AI as an essentially political technology", an "amplification of processes already underway". And, as Joler’s super-chart demonstrates, the outcome of long waves of historical developments. In his book McQuillan asks "what would this way of doing things exaggerate?"
He is far from the only scholar developing a new Ludditism as techno-politics. He points out those original mill-spikers were experts in the machines they sought to destroy. Ergo, an operational understanding of AI is necessary to be able to critique it effectively.
The host of the podcast (@machinekillspod) is studying the development of the insurance industry, and compared the mutual aid societies of the Victorian era which co-existed with the rise of the actuary. “There is no ethic of care” in insurance, it’s just about distribution of risk. Ditto AI. Not here for you, but for your boss.
As Vladan Joder and Kate Amstrong’s mega-map makes clear, AI which relies on the scrapings of the internet to understand human culture has picked up all the bad epistemological habits of the past – racism, coloniality, sexism – and brutality of all sorts which dances on our screens in a demoralizing daily round.
The $64K question is, can there be an AI for liberation? Who is building it? The answer is to come in the next xenosocialist pirate radio broadcast. But let’s not wait for 2054.

LINKS

Medialab Matadero, LAB#03 SYNTHETIC MINDS (ES & ENG)
https://www.medialab-matadero.es/en/programs
Project "channels":
https://www.are.na/medialab-matadero/channels

talk: Davos discussion, "The Expanding Universe of Generative Models"
Centre for the Fourth Industrial Revolution
https://www.weforum.org/events/world-economic-forum-annual-meeting-2024/sessions/the-expanding-universe-of-generative-models/

Bani Brusadin
https://www.cccb.org/es/participantes/ficha/bani-brusadin/37757

The Chronicles of Xenosocialist AI
https://www.medialab-matadero.es/en/projects/chronicles-xenosocialist-ai

"Anatomy of an AI System" visual map
The Amazon Echo as an anatomical map of human labor, data and planetary resources
By Kate Crawford and Vladan Joler (2018)
https://anatomyof.ai/

Kate Crawford, Atlas of AI: Power, Politics, and the Planetary Costs of Artificial Intelligence, 2022
https://knowingmachines.org/publications/calculating-empire

This announcement of the Milan exhibition includes a closeup of the map, showing the density of detail
https://www.e-flux.com/announcements/573730/calculating-empires/

talk: “Refusing the Everyday Fascism of Artificial Intelligence (ft. Dan McQuillan)” on This Machine Kills; @machinekillspod #186.; with Jathan Sadowski and Edward Ongweso Jr.
https://soundcloud.com/thismachinekillspod/186-refusing-the-everyday-fascism-of-artificial-intelligence-ft-dan-mcquillan
text: This new book is a taste of the new scholarly front:
Tiziano Bonini, Emiliano Treré, Algorithms of Resistance: The Everyday Fight against Platform Power (The MIT Press, 2024). “How global workers, influencers, and activists develop tactics of algorithmic resistance by appropriating and repurposing the same algorithms that control our lives.”… “It is no longer enough to automate information flows about us; the goal now is to automate our behavior.”
is available open access:
https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/14329.001.0001

talk: Another fun lecture from the COVER project at Essex U in UK:
James Muldoon, "Artificial Intelligence in the Colonial Matrix of Power"
https://youtu.be/kp_BDpt9beA

This paper theorises how a system of coloniality underpins the structuring logic of artificial intelligence systems....

Machine Vision Doesn’t See You: Trevor Paglen in Madrid

Trevor Paglen in 2018. He's speaking at the World Economic Forum. Applause is... lukewarm.

I caught Trevor Paglen last night here in Madrid. He gave a talk to support his exhibition, “Behold These Glorious Times!” It’s a video, a thundering big screen presentation drawn from the data sets used to train artificial intelligence applications. He gave a highly informative presentation on the historical evolution of artificial intelligence, from its hubristic claustrophobic 1960s academic workshopping to its present world-conquering ambitions.
Julia Kaganskiy is the curator. She worked some years at the New Museum, bringing along programs in the old building just south of the new one. (It was there just before the improvement, spending time sorting out videotapes from the MWF Video collection for the New Museum's XFR Statiom project -- now very old media indeed.)
Kaganskiy’s essay in the show handout cites the German filmmaker Harun Farocki's concept of "operational images" -- images made by machines for machines, images that are designed to perform tasks. (That prescient term, coined in 2000, now names both a research institute and a recent book.)
In his essay "Invisible Images", she cites Paglen’s description of an invisible world of visual culture, in which "machine imaging systems no longer merely represent the world but autonomously shape it". The looking and interpreting of images now is being done mainly by machines.
Artists’ engagement with AI has been principally in the field of images that we can see, i.e., DALL-E 2 and its cousins. Trevor trained as a geographer. His work is conceptually based. In his projects he tries to get behind the apps, not use them. He described his work as a “geographer of technology”.

"Getting started with Image Recognition and Convolutional Neural..."
For me it was a bit of deja vu. Paglen’s tutorial was the kind of thing one had to go through in the ‘90s-early ‘00s to understand WTF was up with the internet. All those white scientist men with their big mainframes seeking to overcome their social isolation… He spoke of ole Woody Bledsoe, who studied phrenology (of course) to develop facial recognition in the 1960s. Woody was working under CIA contract. (Of course.) His idea was to mock up a standard head and determine identities based on deviations from that.
Paglen detailed the story of “Eliza”, the first chatbot, who – wait, which – hooked its users in a way that we who now use similar bots to contact corporations find generally useless and infuriating. In the 1960s, however, the effect “Eliza” had on users was a rather creepy illustration of the Barthean “birth of the reader”.
Paglen clearly charts how the AI programs move from taxonomy to learning library. He discussed the development of the ImageNet database project (2009) which seeks to map all objects for machinic vision. Somewhat blind, as he pointed out, to the difference between the apples of, say, Cézanne and those of the Agrana corporation.
Vital to the procedures of the ongoing Big Scrape, Trevor alluded to the “click workers” who labor to remove the “horrible content” from these image sets. (One article on this topic is titled: 'Without Our Work, Facebook Is Unusable'; who cleans up your “friends” bedroom? Backyard gravesites?)
Facial data sets, he observed, were built on the faces of prisoners, using FBI and other PD databases. Who are we when this is how machines see us?
On the dystopian side, depending on how you look at it, or whether you stand to make money on it or not – Trevor repeated the claim that half of internet content is already AI generated. He called it "goop”. I have seen instances of this, chasing obscure vectors of content, but had no idea it was so widespread. How can you tell? For now, for text, by its descent into gibberish.
In the question period he envisioned a not-far-off moment when the articles you read are written and illustrated for you, each person receiving a different tailored version. Would this make us nostalgic for mass market mediocrity?
Other prospective nasties include AIs which watch you as you drive and modify your insurance premiums in real time.
All that aside – that is, to set aside the imperatives of late capitalism, surveillance capitalism, which rule us, and under which as Matt Christman channeling the late Mark Fisher observed, our desires and aspirations are “embedded in the quicksand of neoliberal subjectivities” – AI and the Matrix-ready machines which run it are an imperative field for artists to jump in and investigate.
Trevor Paglen is the Pablo Picasso of 21st century conceptual art.

LINKS:

Since being busted out of the center of Madrid, Medialab is re-animating under a new program head, Eduardo Castillo-Vinuesa. Trevor's appearance is part of a series, "Synthetic Imaginaries" looking at "non-human agency". "Synthetic Imaginaries", curated by Julia Kaganskiy
https://www.mataderomadrid.org/en/schedule/synthetic-imaginaries

For the wider arc of his work, here's Paglen talking with Eyal Weizman of Forensic Architecture, both great investigative artists --
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vvE-QoMGjck

Exhibition handout – Julia Kaganskiy, "Behold These Glorious Times! (¡Contemplad estos tiempos gloriosos!)" PDF Published on Dec 27, 2023
https://issuu.com/mataderomadrid/docs/programa_de_mano_trevor

Article she cites – Trevor Paglen, “Invisible Images (Your Pictures Are Looking at You)”, December 8, 2016
https://thenewinquiry.com/invisible-images-your-pictures-are-looking-at-you/

"Trevor Paglen: Invisible Images of Surveillance"; 12 min.
speaking at the World Economic Forum (wow!), 2018
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ijVTdSoZEC4

“Woodrow Bledsoe Originates Automated Facial Recognition”
https://www.historyofinformation.com/detail.php?id=2126

"ELIZA is an early natural language processing computer program"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ELIZA

ImageNet
The ImageNet project is a large visual database designed for use in visual object recognition software research
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ImageNet

VOA - Voice of America English News, "Content Workers in Africa Sue Facebook, Report Poor Work Conditions", July 11, 2023
https://learningenglish.voanews.com/a/content-workers-in-africa-sue-facebook-report-poor-work-conditions/7174986.html

Maggie Harrison Dupré, “Short Road to Nowhere: Huge Proportion of Internet Is AI-Generated Slime, Researchers Find Striking”, 1/19/2024
https://futurism.com/the-byte/internet-ai-generated-slime

Side note: Before his talk, Trevor recognized me from old ABC No Rio days. He introduced me to the young curators as an “OG”. In his student days, Trevor was involved in a SF self-organized anarchist punk venue, that was like a kind of sister to ABC No Rio. It had a geographic name, which I simply cannot recall. [Update -- Chris Pramas on FB tipped me to the place. It's Gilman Street. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/924_Gilman_Street] The punk scene of the ‘80s was national, international, with lots of travelers then as now.
“Alternative Voices: 1980s Punk San Francisco”
Photographs by Jeanne Hansen / Interviews and introduction by Jonah Raskin
Alternative Voices | San Francisco Public Library (sfpl.org)

Jello Biafra in 2018; icon of the San Francisco anarcho-punk music scene

Tales of NYC autonomous education…

The Brecht Forum in 2014, shortly before it closed

Lisa Maya Knauer recently posted this to Facebook.
It's a heartfelt memory of one of the pillars of autonomous political education in New York City past.
She writes:
One of my dearest and oldest friends (that is, a friend of long standing, not in age), Michael Lardner, died on Thursday. Michael and I met when we were both young activists in the late 1970s -- we met at the School for Marxist Education in the West Village around 1977 or 1978, and quickly became active in the collective that ran the school. We often joked, in recent years, that back then we were the babies among the members of the Marxist Education Collective, and now we had become the alte kakers (old farts, literally) of the project that emerged from the ashes of the Brecht Forum back in 2014 when the board somewhat precipitously (in my view) dissolved the organization, the Marxist Education Project. I'd been a member of the Brecht board for 20+ years but eventually we established term limits and I was required to take a few years off, so I wasn't on the board at the time that the board shut down the organization. Michael and I and a few others had recently established a working and reading group on precarity or precariousness, called Precarious Labor, Precarious Lives, and the last event held at the Brecht in April or May of 2014 before it shut down was a panel discussion that the two of us had organized on Precarious Labor with a mixture of academics and labor activists (not that those two categories are mutually exclusive -- Ed Ott was one of the panelists). I think the date was May 8, 2014, but I'd have to check some old files (of which I have plenty).
Mike was traveling abroad in 1979 when Arthur Felberbaum, the founder and guiding spirit of the School for Marxist Education, died suddenly. Arthur had been a mentor to both Michael and me -- Mike was working at that time as a typesetter, and Arthur was keenly interested in technology and labor, and changes in the labor process, and both Mike and I were part of a working group on Technology and Labor that unfortunately did not survive long after Arthur's death. Mike and I had somehow arranged to meet up in London that summer (this was in the days before cellphones and the internet), and it was my sad task to tell him of Arthur's death. We spent time knocking about London, meeting up with British leftist and anti-racist activists, went to Rock Against Racism and punk concerts, and Troops out of Ireland protests.

It's hard to summarize a friendship/comradeship that has extended for nearly 45 years (let's say 44 and change). There were 5 a.m. breakfasts at the Kiev after spending the night at a Gang of Four or Bad Brains concert. Many, many collective and committee meetings, Capital classes, protests against U.S. involvement in Central America, days spent painting walls and sanding floors as the Brecht moved to different locations, pushed by the increasingly tight real estate market in New York City.
More recently we often talked late at night when he was out on his nightly walks, about nothing and everything. I can say without any hesitation that we loved each other very deeply -- a love that wasn't erotic or romantic -- except in the sense that many revolutionaries have a romantic tinge to our political passions. It was the love of shared ideals and commitments, a strong and lasting bond that will always be there.
Mike was, of course, the driving force behind the MEP, along with others. I was very active for the first several years -- I still have files and files of notes from meetings -- but markedly less so in the last several months (not for any specific reason, just the natural ebb and flow of political and other commitments) and helped it grow into a truly global intellectual and activist community. It remains for us, his friends, comrades, and co-conspirators, to carry that work through.

Camilo Vive commented:
Sorry for your and our loss, thanks for sharing, I think it is hard for some to image how marginalized the Cold War made many activists over the years, I know that it wasn’t easy to keep the seeds of resistance alive, but I hope that by more people learning more about what it has taken to tend to and maintain a wider political spectrum that more can be inspired by people like Michael about what it takes to strive for fundamental change for the long haul.

Illustrations via thetricontinental.org

See also:

Our Legacy: 2014-today: Birth of The Marxist Education Project
https://marxedproject.org/our-legacy/

New York’s Brecht Forum to Close by Mostafa Heddaya April 14, 2014
https://hyperallergic.com/120414/new-yorks-brecht-forum-to-close/

Workshop: Legalities of Documentary Photography - Sun 7/24 2pm

Photo: Clayton Patterson, who videotaped the Tompkins Square Park police riot in 1988, being arrested by plainclothese police for... ?? Photo by Q. Sakamaki

As laws radically change, art interventions and protests flair in our polarized society, and the need for documenting history is incredibly urgent. But what are your rights as a filmmaker? And what are your responsibilities to those you film?
This practical seminar from veteran filmmaker Kevin Frech has two parts: the first covers issues from interacting with law enforcement to understanding property rights, on-camera releases as well as protecting yourself and those around you.
The second part includes tips to get the best, most impactful footage you can: better framing, better lighting, and better sound.
This workshop is ideal for citizen activists, journalists and socially-engaged artists.
Kevin R. Frech is a mixed-media artist and award-winning filmmaker. His work explores the turbulent and comedic interactions of people on their environment, and vice-versa. He has filmed on location in five continents and his works have shown in Seattle, Chicago, New York, Beijing, Venezia, Sao Paolo and Panama City, and on PBS and the Sundance Channel.

Robby Herbst and Jim Costanzo at Summer School Thurs 7-28 7pm

Couple of artists on some history and capitalism
With Robby Herbst and Jim Costanzo
Thursday July 28 at 7:00pm

Presented as part of Summer School: Art, Education & Radical Resistance
ABC No Rio in Exile at PS122 Gallery

Robby Herbst will share a history of the West Coast free-schools movement connecting Vanguarde art practices to the Bay Area Counterculture. His talk will track the little known and influential Portala Institute, founded in Menlo Park, CA in 1966, as an incubator of educational innovation. The extended Portola Network connects platforms for educational experiments to the Whole Earth Catalog, little known 1970's era counter-education publication projects, The New Games movement and the People's Computer Company. The talk will touch on the themes of anti-fascism, and new forms of labor that were emerging in the 1970s.
Jim Costanzo will discuss the most recent failure of Capitalism. The coronavirus pandemic comes 15 years after criminal activities by Wall Street crashed the international banking system which led to protests in the Mideast and Occupy Wall Street. Before coronavirus, the gap in income between billionaires and working people was the highest in U.S. history. It has grown larger during the pandemic. Economic inequities have always manifested itself in the exploitation of women, minorities, workers and the environment. Disaster Capitalism and Surveillance Capitalism are important concepts to understand our current situation but ultimately it is just Capitalism.

"Summer School" Event Schedule, regularly updated.

ANTI-UNIVERSITY 1968; 2015 – ongoing

The Antiuniversity was a London project of the late 1960s. It included figures such as C.L.R James, Stokely Carmichael, Juliet Mitchell, R.D. Laing and Stuart Hall. They sought to break the structures enforced by institutions.
The Antiuniversity wanted to allow people to meet each other without having to act out socially prescribed roles. This they believed would expose the terrible reality of modern life, in which nobody really knew anyone, and spark a revolution. Despite being short-lived and mostly shrouded in mystery, t he Antiuniversity continues to capture the imagination of anyone interested in alternative education, self- organisation, non-hierarchical structures and radicalism.
– possibly Anti-University 2015 (slight redactions)

The ANTI-U NOW project is “A collaborative autonomous education experiment. Teaching and learning as direct action.
An ongoing programme of radical education & an annual festival. Antiuniversity Now is a collaborative experiment to revisit and reimagine the 1968 Antiuniversity of London in an ongoing programme of of free and inclusive self-organised radical education events. It was set up to challenge academic and class hierarchy and the exclusivity of the expensive degree through an open invitation to teach and learn any subject, in any form, anywhere.”
– @antiuniversity

In London in the ‘60s, raising the intellectual proletariat rabble, was Alex Trocchi, novelist and Situationist. He aimed for an “invisible insurrection of a million minds” – As he wrote in sigma, “Now and in the future our centre is everywhere, our circumference nowhere. No one is in control. No one is excluded.… The conference begins now and goes on indefinitely. We are particularly anxious to have your participation soon, as soon as possible.”

LINKS

The Antiuniversity of London - an Introduction to Deinstitutionalisation
https://antihistory.org/deinsti

Monoskop links for Antiuniversity of London
https://monoskop.org/Antiuniversity_of_London

Antiuniversity Now
https://www.facebook.com/antiuniversityofeastlondon/

Reference for Trocchi: "sigma: A Tactical Blueprint" by Alexander Trocchi (1963?)
http://www.notbored.org/sigma.html